![]() ![]() ![]() HDDs do not have that same more predictable lifespan. Because they lack moving parts, and the parts the few major parts they do have are made from lab grade pure silicon it can be fairly accurate. You should not defragment your SSD, assuming that is part of your disk cleanup. This is inherent lifespan that the manufacturer can measure and test for. 0x35042E503504 -> 0x3504 / 0x2E50 / 0x3504Īs for the reason for the high usage, it could be related to the page file or hibernation file. ![]() I don't understand the Media Wearout Indicator (attribute E6h), but it appears to consist of 3 values: which means that the remaining life is 44%. I couldn't find an official TBW spec for your drive, but I'm guessing that it would be 80TB. The health status percentage for SSD is intended to show the remaining life while in implementation it is just the calibrated percentage of a reference smart attribute chosen by CrystalDiskInfo (see official manual) which is specific to the SSD brand. In any case the reported writes are consistent with the other SMART data. The actual result would be greater then 32TB since the real WAF would be greater than 1. There are no problems in usage of this drive. I have used a capacity of 128GiB in order to include the overprovisioned space. Is this cause for concern This SSD has 98 health since a few months (8-9 months atleast). Total Host Writes (attribute F1h) is 0xAEA5 (= 44709) GB.Īverage P/E cycles (attribute ADh) is 0圎A (= 234).Īssuming perfect wear levelling and a write amplification factor (WAF) of 1, then the current TBW value is. I don't understand where the 47% comes from. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |